|
Post by genesda on Jul 21, 2004 6:51:26 GMT -5
Sandy Burger was caught stealing cpkmtyollified documents from the national archive.
The question is what was in those documents?
He made a couple of trips AFTER he said he made a mistake and took more documents home, some of which were destroyed.
Why would he steal documents relating to 9/11 unless they showed Clinton and himself to be liars on their dealings with terrorism?
These were CpkmtyollIFIED materials ansd were not to be taken from the archives , AND HE KNEW THAT as a former national security advisor!!
It looks like the Clinton administration really was weak on the terror issue, as some of already knew, and Sandy's job was to destroy the proof so the 9/11 commission wouldn't see those documents!
The fact that this was known months ago by the 9/11 commission and they said nothing about it shows just how much this group was interested in finding the truth. Their report should be trash canned as soon as it comes out because there's no way it can be anything but a cover up of the Clinton administration and a bashing of the Bush administration. One had 8 YEARS and the other about 8 months to deal with the terrorists.
Clinton was responsible for 9/11 because he had the opportuninty to deal with the terrorists and refused to do so.
His inaction is what led to 9/11.[/color]
|
|
|
Post by babysis on Jul 21, 2004 7:41:57 GMT -5
gene, no one is going to believe you if you just post this. You need links to stories, or let people know where they can look up and find this information.
That's like me coming here and saying "The world is flat" and expect everyone to just believe me.
|
|
|
Post by LauraJean on Jul 21, 2004 7:49:58 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by genesda on Jul 21, 2004 8:00:36 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by babysis on Jul 21, 2004 8:09:05 GMT -5
I was gone all day yesterday with a job interview and volunteer work. I didn't have time to watch the news and I only have the local paper to read and don't recall seeing that. I'll have to look again. I usually just skim the political headlines as most of it doesn't interest me.
|
|
|
Post by LauraJean on Jul 21, 2004 8:09:28 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by LauraJean on Jul 21, 2004 8:10:52 GMT -5
I was gone all day yesterday with a job interview and volunteer work. I didn't have time to watch the news and I only have the local paper to read and don't recall seeing that. I'll have to look again. I usually just skim the political headlines as most of it doesn't interest me. LOL, like I said, if your local paper is the NYT, it's no wonder you missed it. Hope the job interview went well! Peace, LJ
|
|
|
Post by babysis on Jul 21, 2004 8:11:06 GMT -5
I do have a question, just from scanning the titles of those links... how is it Clinton's fault if the aid screwed up??? Wouldn't it be the aid's fault? I'll have to read more when I get home from work... maybe it answers my question.
|
|
|
Post by babysis on Jul 21, 2004 8:12:19 GMT -5
LOL, like I said, if your local paper is the NYT, it's no wonder you missed it. Hope the job interview went well! Peace, LJ Nope! It's a little small town (20,000) newspaper. I think the interview went well. I'm praying it did. I'd really like to get out of my current job and into this field that is a step in the way I want to go.
|
|
|
Post by LauraJean on Jul 21, 2004 8:29:42 GMT -5
I do have a question, just from scanning the titles of those links... how is it Clinton's fault if the aid screwed up??? Wouldn't it be the aid's fault? I'll have to read more when I get home from work... maybe it answers my question. Because Berger pilfered the files during the Bush administration and says he did it on behalf of the Clinton administration. If he did it on behalf of the Clinton adiministration, isn't it logical to conclude that Clinton asked him to do it? And, not to put too fine a point on it, if Bush is president, exactly what "Clinton administration" is there to be acting for? I know you probably hate him, but read the Rush Limbaugh link anyway. It is a good summation of the situation. Blessings! LJ P.S., re your interview, aren't you in healthcare? What field are you pursuing? I'll offer a prayer for you!!
|
|
|
Post by genesda on Jul 21, 2004 8:43:33 GMT -5
I do have a question, just from scanning the titles of those links... how is it Clinton's fault if the aid screwed up??? Wouldn't it be the aid's fault? I'll have to read more when I get home from work... maybe it answers my question. Do you actually believe aides do things without the Boss' consent or direction? Clinton was no longer president, so why did Sandy go there?
Answer: Clinton sent him there to hide anything that would damage Clinton's handling of the terrorist problem. Remember, Clinton said terrorism was his "top priority" as president. I believe Sandy was helping Clinton hide the fact that Clinton didn't care about terrorism at all. [/color]
|
|
|
Post by marysia on Jul 21, 2004 9:39:32 GMT -5
gene, thank you for starting this thread! I've been waiting for someone to do so! what i can't believe is people are trying to say - it was by accident!
the only way IMO someone is going to shove papers into their pants is if they are incontinent! other than that -- someone is trying to hide something. now sure, when i'm suited up with no pockets i'll often fold the event information and stick it in my back -however it's nothing cpkmtyollified or whatnot. nor do i have any type of breifcase, bag or posket what so ever.
hannity had liberals calling in to offer their opinion -- i was floored.
funny how things that happened within clinton's group have nothing to do with clinton himself yet when it's someone within the "bush camp" it's all his fault! go figure!!
|
|
|
Post by genesda on Jul 21, 2004 10:17:16 GMT -5
gene, thank you for starting this thread! I've been waiting for someone to do so! what i can't believe is people are trying to say - it was by accident! the only way IMO someone is going to shove papers into their pants is if they are incontinent! other than that -- someone is trying to hide something. now sure, when i'm suited up with no pockets i'll often fold the event information and stick it in my back -however it's nothing cpkmtyollified or whatnot. nor do i have any type of breifcase, bag or posket what so ever. hannity had liberals calling in to offer their opinion -- i was floored. funny how things that happened within clinton's group have nothing to do with clinton himself yet when it's someone within the "bush camp" it's all his fault! go figure!! Maybe Sandy Berger has a paper fetish? Ah shucks! He was still trying to protect Clinton's shortcomings while he was president. I hope the Republicans follow through on this and pursue it to the degree that the Democrats do with Republicans. Always remember, Republicans went to jail for doing less than what Berger did.
BERGER STOLE CpkmtyollIFIED DOCUMENTS AND DESTROYED THEM!!
It is believed that what Berger stole was documents admitting Al Qeada was active in the U.S. and Clinton knew it and had no plan to deal with it. That would make his testimony under oath a lie because he testified that plans were implemented and Bush didn't follow through. The truth is there were no plans dealing with terrorism under the Clinton administration.[/color]
|
|
|
Post by LauraJean on Jul 21, 2004 10:40:36 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Pietro on Jul 21, 2004 11:35:25 GMT -5
Sandy Burger was caught stealing cpkmtyollified documents from the national archive.
The question is what was in those documents? . [/color][/quote] The originals were not taken so the documents are still there and available. www.msnbc.msn.com/id/5463586/
|
|