|
|
Post by MorningStar on Jun 16, 2004 16:49:58 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by genesda on Jun 17, 2004 6:20:24 GMT -5
Someone put together a decent comparison on the differences between Bush and Kerry. Enjoy: www.livejournal.com/users/airscale/74053.html Yes, the differences are loud and clear. It depends on whether one wants socialism or individualism.
I heard neal Boortz say that half of the people in this country want a benevolent dictator ruling over them and I believe that's true.
People seem to want someone do everything for them without ever considering who's going to pay for it.
Kerry is an anti-war liberal. One might say he is closer to a communist than an american. He was born here but his ideas are closer to what the Soviet Union offered.
I'll stick with individualism.
[/color] |
|
|
|
Post by MorningStar on Jun 17, 2004 7:56:47 GMT -5
I'm glad you found it useful, not like you needed it at all, given the fact that Kerry looks French and is therefore evil.
|
|
|
|
Post by genesda on Jun 17, 2004 8:08:36 GMT -5
I'm glad you found it useful, not like you needed it at all, given the fact that Kerry looks French and is therefore evil. Not because he "looks" french, but because he is evil.
He admitted being part of atrocities in Vietnam, much worse than what out troops have been shown doing in Iraq, yet no one has prosecuted him for his evil doings.
He lies in front of the t.v. cameras every day and these lies are reported as truth or either ignored by the partisan media.
Kerry is evil.
[/color] |
|
|
|
Post by MorningStar on Jun 17, 2004 9:57:39 GMT -5
Kerry lies.
Bush lies.
Lots of people lie, but people will believe only what they want to hear. They dismiss things that don't agree with their tightly held (and fragile) view of the world, and dismiss the others as 'liberal', or 'fanatic', or 'the conservative machine'.
We spend so much time arguing with eachother - and to what end?
|
|
|
|
Post by genesda on Jun 21, 2004 7:56:28 GMT -5
Kerry lies. Bush lies. Lots of people lie, but people will believe only what they want to hear. They dismiss things that don't agree with their tightly held (and fragile) view of the world, and dismiss the others as 'liberal', or 'fanatic', or 'the conservative machine'. We spend so much time arguing with eachother - and to what end? Please give some examples of Bush's lies. I'm interested in seeing them. [/color] |
|
|
|
Post by marysia on Jun 22, 2004 8:16:11 GMT -5
what i don't understand about those who support kerry -- how will they know what he will do in a situation? for example, everyone know's and knew bush was more pro life and would stand up for anything new that opposed this matter. kerry (for lack of a better term) flip flops based upon his audience. kerry has said -- the troops will be out by the end of my first term. ah, that's about 5 years and i believe bush mentioned the majority would be out in 3-4. sure we'll probably establish a base there but we've had sailors and soldiers over there since the 90's.
the indecicisivness (spx?) is what scares me most about kerry. if prior he says -- fixing the budget without increasing taxes thenn gets in and changes everything and atially raises taxes like what happened when he got into the senate -- what would be our recourse?
|
|
|
|
Post by genesda on Jun 22, 2004 10:46:24 GMT -5
what i don't understand about those who support kerry -- how will they know what he will do in a situation? for example, everyone know's and knew bush was more pro life and would stand up for anything new that opposed this matter. kerry (for lack of a better term) flip flops based upon his audience. kerry has said -- the troops will be out by the end of my first term. ah, that's about 5 years and i believe bush mentioned the majority would be out in 3-4. sure we'll probably establish a base there but we've had sailors and soldiers over there since the 90's. the indecicisivness (spx?) is what scares me most about kerry. if prior he says -- fixing the budget without increasing taxes thenn gets in and changes everything and atially raises taxes like what happened when he got into the senate -- what would be our recourse? That's exactly my point about having an educated voting public, which would spell doom for the liberals.
An educated voting public would see through the lies and flip flops of people like Kerry and would reject them.
The liberal Democrats want an illiterate voting public who will buy their lies and false promises.
Remember Clinton's middle cpkmtyoll tax cut that was promised as a candidate. All of a sudden,
"I've never worked so hard on anything in all my life, but I just can't find the money for that middle cpkmtyoll tax cut".
Do you remember that one? That's what you get with Democrats. They have no honor or shame.
[/color] |
|
