|
Post by Kee on Oct 22, 2003 21:59:07 GMT -5
I was actually defending Traffic and what was implied about his motives. Please read the entire thread or follow the quotes back (I think it starts somewhere on page 10) and you will see that I was not saying anything bad about Traffic. Not necessary for me to read what I have no time for babysis. I saw the stroke..... and it wasn't for Traffic. You might want to work on your wording as not ALL will have time, or even be interested to read hours to formulate an impression.
Oh and it had nothing to do with what YOU said ABOUT Traffic........that was indeed the point of MY post. IF you wish to refute what I said about him, i.e. that he is patient, intelligent, etc., and derseves the credit for conducting himself in a civil manor, then by all means site the quotes of your evidence that dispute this.
|
|
|
Post by heathen76 on Oct 22, 2003 22:25:46 GMT -5
Okay, one of the not so scientific minded enters the argument to point out the obvious. According to your logic........there's more than one garden of eden then! ;D ;D ;D You forgot about the gardens of eden in Texas and Alaska!
|
|
|
Post by babysis on Oct 22, 2003 22:43:08 GMT -5
Not necessary for me to read what I have no time for babysis. I saw the stroke..... and it wasn't for Traffic. You might want to work on your wording as not ALL will have time, or even be interested to read hours to formulate an impression.
Oh and it had nothing to do with what YOU said ABOUT Traffic........that was indeed the point of MY post. IF you wish to refute what I said about him, i.e. that he is patient, intelligent, etc., and derseves the credit for conducting himself in a civil manor, then by all means site the quotes of your evidence that dispute this. I don't disagree with it. I completely agree. But if you do go back and take the time to read you will see that someone was upset as to why Traffic wanted evidence and it came out that that person didn't remember where they learned the information they presented and therefore could not provide it, even if it does exist. This person was upset with Traffic thinking he thought people were stupid. Here's the quote. I was telling this person that I believe that Traffic was wanting to see where the information came from so that he could learn about it, and after seeing the facts or lack there of he could draw the necessary conclusions on the accuracy of the information for himself rather than taking someone's word for it. If you aren't willing to take the time to read the entire string of posts related to it, please refrain from commenting since your comments are inaccurate.
|
|
|
Post by michaeldark on Oct 22, 2003 23:34:06 GMT -5
I don't disagree with it. I completely agree. But if you do go back and take the time to read you will see that someone was upset as to why Traffic wanted evidence and it came out that that person didn't remember where they learned the information they presented and therefore could not provide it, even if it does exist. This person was upset with Traffic thinking he thought people were stupid. Here's the quote. I was telling this person that I believe that Traffic was wanting to see where the information came from so that he could learn about it, and after seeing the facts or lack there of he could draw the necessary conclusions on the accuracy of the information for himself rather than taking someone's word for it. If you aren't willing to take the time to read the entire string of posts related to it, please refrain from commenting since your comments are inaccurate. *modified for baring false witness because I only took the time to look at my quotes,got offended because I thought the issue was resolved,and didn't realize you had directed it at Kee,Babysis*
|
|
|
Post by babysis on Oct 23, 2003 6:13:57 GMT -5
*modified for baring false witness because I only took the time to look at my quotes,got offended because I thought the issue was resolved,and didn't realize you had directed it at Kee,Babysis* No problem michael. I just wanted to get the issue straightened out with her since we all already had it straightened out.
|
|
|
Post by Kee on Oct 23, 2003 10:22:19 GMT -5
I don't disagree with it. I completely agree. But if you do go back and take the time to read you will see that someone was upset as to why Traffic wanted evidence and it came out that that person didn't remember where they learned the information they presented and therefore could not provide it, even if it does exist. This person was upset with Traffic thinking he thought people were stupid. Here's the quote. I read all of that, and I think you were reading too much emotion into those post.
I read that too, and my post had nothing to do with this reply of yours.
Well it turns out that I had in fact read all of these post you are referring to, and my comment was based on this text by you:
You're welcome. I just didn't want to see a fight or argument or anger flaring up. It happens so easily on the net. Just try to keep it to a minimum the best I can.
I don't see that you put the calming effect on the discussion that you credit yourself with, anymore than I see a potential fight or anger flaring up from what was posted and questioned. Your post sounds like posturing your authority you see in yourself here in these forums babysis. Is that why you are still now taking issue with me on this and feeling some need to defend yourself?
All I said was to give credit where credit was due, i.e. Traffic's calm demeanor, intelligence and so on. Then you turned around and interpreted that as me indicating you said something bad about him. I never implied that at all, so your perception was mistaken.
|
|
|
Post by Kee on Oct 23, 2003 10:43:32 GMT -5
You forgot about the gardens of eden in Texas and Alaska! You were reading my mind heathen!!
|
|
|
Post by larrygn on Oct 23, 2003 11:32:11 GMT -5
Kee: I am not saying there was not oil elsewhere, just that a great concentration ( in fact the greatest ) would have been in the original Garden of Eden), even more so, if God had not used his flaming sword to destroy the best areas when he drove man out! Let us get with logic, and no put words into my mouth. If you can not understand the senerio, don't comment on it.
I am saying that God man man could exist for as long as God wanted him to in the Garden of Eden, the Iraq areas mentioned for semi-man are to the north of the northern border, using the Biblical texts. Yours in the Ever Living Christ, Larry
|
|
|
Post by Kee on Oct 23, 2003 12:30:20 GMT -5
Kee: I am not saying there was not oil elsewhere, just that a great concentration ( in fact the greatest ) would have been in the original Garden of Eden), even more so, if God had not used his flaming sword to destroy the best areas when he drove man out! Let us get with logic, and no put words into my mouth. If you can not understand the senerio, don't comment on it. I am saying that God man man could exist for as long as God wanted him to in the Garden of Eden, the Iraq areas mentioned for semi-man are to the north of the northern border, using the Biblical texts. Yours in the Ever Living Christ, Larry Larry, I understand enough to make any comments I feel inclined to. The concentration of oil proves nothing. You may feel that your theory of an angry, tyranical God using his flaming sword to destroy and punish his own creations is logical, but your belief does not make this so. Doesn't make it truth either.
|
|
|
Post by Pietro on Oct 23, 2003 12:46:00 GMT -5
I don't claim to know alot about science because I don't, so would someboby please tell me in simple terms-of course
How did life get started from non-living material- because you can not get something from nothing unless you are God!
If everything is made out of matter you and me and the world then how did the world get here? Either 1. Somebody made the world or-2. the world made itself-
So if it was not created like the book of Genesis tells us then how did it get here? It was thought into existance. [/b][/quote] Ya, remember E=mc 2? God's will has big time energy.
|
|
|
Post by babysis on Oct 23, 2003 14:08:53 GMT -5
All I said was to give credit where credit was due, i.e. Traffic's calm demeanor, intelligence and so on. Then you turned around and interpreted that as me indicating you said something bad about him. I never implied that at all, so your perception was mistaken. This is all I have time to respond to right now. I was trying to calm the original poster of the comment down. I knew Traffic would be calm. But he had not responded yet so I couldn't give credit someone that nothing happened to give credit for.
|
|
|
Post by babysis on Oct 23, 2003 14:11:27 GMT -5
kee,
After posting that last post I realized that we don't need to discuss this anymore. No one ended up getting upset because of the comment, all three of us involved are fine and there is nothing more to talk about on it. Of course you are more the welcome to continue talking about it if you want, but I am done.
|
|
|
Post by larrygn on Oct 23, 2003 14:42:39 GMT -5
Kee: 1. you are certainly welcome to make any statement you want, and that is true, because you live in a nation that basks in the Holy Light of Freedom. 2. You are also correct, my saying something does not make it true. 3. My statements; however do fit the Bible, science, and history better than any others I can find, so I find them to be most correct for me.
Pietro: I understand the first day of creation would have been before the law E=mc2 was in effect. God created both matter and energy, and decided how to show a correlation between them, that would make the intellects stop and think why?
Yours in the Ever Living Christ, Larry
|
|
|
Post by stevec on Oct 23, 2003 15:21:28 GMT -5
"I cannot believe that God plays dice with the universe."
--Albert Einstein
|
|
|
Post by Pietro on Oct 23, 2003 15:51:13 GMT -5
Pietro: I understand the first day of creation would have been before the law E=mc2 was in effect. God created both matter and energy, and decided how to show a correlation between them, that would make the intellects stop and think why? Yours in the Ever Living Christ, Larry How about creation came in accordance with the law? pkmtyolm and energy are not different things in correlation. They are different forms of the same thing in equation. pkmtyolm, an expression of the energy potential in God's will? The law already existing in God's mind but not finding application until creation? I don't know.
|
|