|
|
Post by genesda on May 3, 2004 4:32:59 GMT -5
gene, just as your claims of the knowledge of Daniel and REvelations are something established by the organization of the SDA. i'm assuming here, you choose to go their route because it fit with what you read and gathered for yourself. for anyone IMO, that chooses a denomination, it's the same thing. I believe the understanding of daniel and Revelation was delivered by the holy spirit to people who were studying the bible for truth who later became the SDA church.
The understanding that Rome, and many non-Rc churches put forth on these two books is easily refuted, and has been done so, by simply using the bible as it's own interpreter.
Then again, one must look for truth in order to find it. If one is comfortable where one is, then one sees no need to look further and accepts whatever they are told.
[/color] |
|
|
|
Post by genesda on May 3, 2004 4:34:48 GMT -5
actually gene, it's your truth. not the Truth that we deny. only your version of it. Then the quotes from the Rc archives are lies, jokes or what? [/color] |
|
|
|
Post by RealistState on May 3, 2004 17:36:16 GMT -5
actually gene, it's your truth. not the Truth that we deny. only your version of it. Then the quotes from the Rc archives are lies, jokes or what? [/color][/quote] The fact is your quotes are from your "little SDA book" of anti-Catholic rhetoric. You've never seen the source nor read them in context. You quote what somone else has told you to quote as "gotchas" not even knowing if they are accurate or not. |
|
|
|
Post by genesda on May 4, 2004 4:05:58 GMT -5
The fact is your quotes are from your "little SDA book" of anti-Catholic rhetoric. You've never seen the source nor read them in context. You quote what somone else has told you to quote as "gotchas" not even knowing if they are accurate or not. Yes, there is a compliation of these ACTUAL QUOTES, and I've not read them in the actual documents, but rest assured, the SDA church nor any other church has to make this stuff up. It's there. It's your church history.
By the way, the bible is antiRc. It's not just "rethoric".
[/color] |
|
|
|
Post by RealistState on May 4, 2004 4:44:11 GMT -5
The fact is your quotes are from your "little SDA book" of anti-Catholic rhetoric. You've never seen the source nor read them in context. You quote what somone else has told you to quote as "gotchas" not even knowing if they are accurate or not. Yes, there is a compliation of these ACTUAL QUOTES, and I've not read them in the actual documents, but rest assured, the SDA church nor any other church has to make this stuff up. It's there. It's your church history.[/color][/quote] And yet, when I and others have shown you the errors, you choose to ignore us and believe your "little SDA book" over the truth. [/color][/quote] No, it's only your interpretation of Scripture that is anti-Roman Catholic. |
|
|
|
Post by HomeAtLast on May 4, 2004 9:51:14 GMT -5
The fact is your quotes are from your "little SDA book" of anti-Catholic rhetoric. You've never seen the source nor read them in context. You quote what somone else has told you to quote as "gotchas" not even knowing if they are accurate or not. Yes, there is a compliation of these ACTUAL QUOTES, and I've not read them in the actual documents, but rest assured, the SDA church nor any other church has to make this stuff up. It's there. It's your church history.
By the way, the bible is antiRc. It's not just "rethoric".
[/color][/quote] gene, As you have posted all of your "quotes" out of context thus, changing the meaning of them, I am sure your "Little SDA book of Gotchas" (as Realist would say, I really like that, Realist!!! ;D), has them out of context, also. Blessings, Ann |
|
|
|
Post by genesda on May 6, 2004 5:22:16 GMT -5
gene, As you have posted all of your "quotes" out of context thus, changing the meaning of them, I am sure your "Little SDA book of Gotchas" (as Realist would say, I really like that, Realist!!! ;D), has them out of context, also. Blessings, Ann Please explain how the following is out of context:
"Our Lord God the pope".
What would it take for context to change the meanings of the above words?
"the pope is so great an authority that even if an angel erred in the faith, the pope could judge and excommunicate it out of heaven"
"the pope can change Divine law"
These are just a few quotes from your leradership that have never been denied or recanted. What context is there that I'm not understanding?
By the way, today will probably be the last time I'm posting here. Don't everyone cheer at once.
[/color] |
|
