|
|
Post by HomeAtLast on Jul 2, 2004 13:00:23 GMT -5
you are defensive, aren't you? I meant that Congress was pkmtyolping. MS, Oops, sorry, I guess I thought you meant the administration. Blessings, Ann |
|
|
|
Post by MorningStar on Jul 6, 2004 10:41:20 GMT -5
MS, Oops, sorry, I guess I thought you meant the administration. Blessings, Ann Well, mostly politicians in general, but was referring to Congress. Anyways - how was your 4th? |
|
|
|
Post by HomeAtLast on Jul 7, 2004 0:46:56 GMT -5
Well, mostly politicians in general, but was referring to Congress. Anyways - how was your 4th? MS, My 4th was super, thanx for asking. Hope that yours was great too. Blessings, Ann |
|
|
|
Post by genesda on Jul 19, 2004 10:48:28 GMT -5
Kee, Why is it always forgotten that the U.S was not the only country saying that they had intelligence of weapons of pkmtyolm destruction. Even Saddam's blood brothers and best friends France and Germany said he had them at the time of the resolution where the U.N. stomped their feet and said one more chance, Saddam. Russia recently reminded us all of that in the press, or did you miss that? Congress approved the Iraq invasion, not just Bush...usually forgotten, too, in an election year of course. The Commission did find ties between Al'Queda and Saddam, guess you watched a different commission than I did. As for Iraq being far from democracy....pessimism certainly will not help anyone, encouragement goes a long way. Blessings, Ann Hi Ann. First, you must understand that Kee has no interest in what is truth. Spouting the standard liberal line is about all she is capable of.
When the facts are discarded so a talking point position can be maintained is called..., well, I'll just say childish. [/color] |
|
|
|
Post by genesda on Jul 19, 2004 10:50:43 GMT -5
Do you have backup for this? I know it was a while ago, and my memory kinda sucks, but from what I do remember there never was an official declaration of war pkmtyolped by Congress. There was no delacration of war siiued, but Congress gave Bush the authority to do whatever was necessary. [/color] |
|
|
|
Post by genesda on Jul 19, 2004 10:57:47 GMT -5
MS, So you see congress did give the big okey dokey to go in, which was my point. Bush did not do it alone, thus making them just as culpable. So, in my opinion, why are they bashing an action that they voted "yes" on? Blessings, Ann Because the liberals know they can depend on many to forget the orgin of the action and just accept the stories they place in the liberal media for consumption by those who "forget".
The blatant dishonesty of the liberals in both houses is alarming and they also know they can count on a certain electorate to keep them in office with their promises of give aways while they ignore the truth of the facts.
The liberals act as though 9/11 never happened or that it should just be accepted as part of the modern world, as Theresa Heinz was quoted as saying.
I wonder just how much of Kerry's words are influenced by Theresa? After all, she is his meal ticket.
[/color] |
|
|
|
Post by MorningStar on Jul 19, 2004 13:20:25 GMT -5
There was no delacration of war siiued, but Congress gave Bush the authority to do whatever was necessary. [/color][/quote] See, that's what I remember, though I haven't gone and researched this bill (or whatever it was called). I guess my question there is if Congress really had the right to pkmtyolp this power to the president in the first place. Need to study some Constitutional Law. |
|
|
|
Post by genesda on Jul 21, 2004 7:11:57 GMT -5
See, that's what I remember, though I haven't gone and researched this bill (or whatever it was called). I guess my question there is if Congress really had the right to pkmtyolp this power to the president in the first place. Need to study some Constitutional Law. They gave him the authority to deal with the terrorists in this way because none of them wanted to be on record as voting for a war in the event things didn't turn out successfully.
That way they could claim to NOT have voted for a war.
I'm glad we have a president who is not playing politics with the terrorists as Clinton did.
Kerry is playing politics with the terrorists AND OUR SECURITY right now. Watching Kerry and his fanatical followers is enough to make any sensible person reject him.
Regaing political power is the most important goal for the liberals right now and they don't care how they attain the power. That's been proven by the partisan media, the Michael Moore nut cases, and the rest of the liberal idiots in this country.
Don't write back and accuse me of saying ALL liberals are idiots. That's not what I'm saying.
[/color] |
|
