|
|
Post by Jan on Jul 19, 2003 0:04:33 GMT -5
guideme said Ok, agreed in a way...Romans use to ride white horses, etc....conquerers, etc.... Well, our Lord Jesus Christ certainly did this - who else did this who was a leader? And many would refute that our Lord Jesus Christ was a leader of the world at this time  ? ABSOLUTELY I believe you got it, guideme!   <>< |
|
|
|
Post by guidemeLord on Jul 19, 2003 0:07:19 GMT -5
sorry you are not making any sence here but that is what I generally think of your end time views so what's new? :-) I was typing pretty fast and left out a couple words... sorry, I modified it... And you know what? You could really learn something if you listened to my "end times gibberish" instead of dismissing it as such. |
|
|
|
Post by Jan on Jul 19, 2003 0:07:23 GMT -5
quideme Absolutely incorrect, and why the "LOL" ? And a PS: Looks like you will be mod of this forum - uhmmmmmm <>< |
|
|
|
Post by guidemeLord on Jul 19, 2003 0:10:13 GMT -5
guideme said Ok, agreed in a way...Romans use to ride white horses, etc....conquerers, etc.... Well, our Lord Jesus Christ certainly did this - who else did this who was a leader? And many would refute that our Lord Jesus Christ was a leader of the world at this time ? ABSOLUTELY I believe you got it, guideme! <>< Actually I sure wish I could have modified that post before you got to it... At least Joyful knew what my point was even though it didn't make sense... a white horse is a war horse... if this scripture signified a peaceful entry by the AC it would have been on an *** not a war horse.....but it is Christ conquering on a war horse... |
|
|
|
Post by AJoyfulHeart on Jul 19, 2003 0:19:25 GMT -5
ok now I understand what you are saying and in saying that the white horse is that of a returning hero conqueror makes sence. I do not think that the one in Rev. 4 is ridden by Christ but that it is ridden by a conquering hero sertainly makes sence I was typing pretty fast and left out a couple words... sorry, I modified it... And you know what? You could really learn something if you listened to my "end times gibberish" instead of dismissing it as such. |
|
|
|
Post by Jan on Jul 19, 2003 0:20:23 GMT -5
Because someone might "get" what you are speaking about, may possibly make your post "correct"? I understand, too, about "war" horses in Scripture...uhmm....  <>< |
|
|
|
Post by AJoyfulHeart on Jul 19, 2003 0:22:42 GMT -5
And you know what? You could really learn something if you listened to my "end times gibberish" instead of dismissing it as such. You know I really respect your views on many issues and have therefore tried to understand your view on the end times but I can not make it gibe with scripture sorry. So I am going to have to agree to disagree on this one sorry. |
|
|
|
Post by Jan on Jul 19, 2003 0:23:01 GMT -5
Uhmm...how can the AC be a returning hero conqueror <>< |
|
|
|
Post by AJoyfulHeart on Jul 19, 2003 0:26:11 GMT -5
A) I am not positive this is the AC and B) this guy goes out to conqher and returns to wherever he rules victorious Uhmm...how can the AC be a returning hero conqueror <>< |
|
|
|
Post by AJoyfulHeart on Jul 19, 2003 0:27:16 GMT -5
I am always logged in but I am so tired I can not even check my spelling as my vision is beginning to blur....good night
|
|
|
|
Post by guidemeLord on Jul 19, 2003 0:31:58 GMT -5
quideme Absolutely incorrect, and why the "LOL" ? And a PS: Looks like you will be mod of this forum - uhmmmmmm <>< Thanks for your support Jan. I guess I may be but that really has nothing to do with just dismissing my view.. Not letting a person into a conversation is kinda rude, and only because they don't see things the same? I will be a great moderater... Thanks! LOL Lots of Love... |
|
|
|
Post by guidemeLord on Jul 19, 2003 0:38:48 GMT -5
ok now I understand what you are saying and in saying that the white horse is that of a returning hero conqueror makes sence. I do not think that the one in Rev. 4 is ridden by Christ but that it is ridden by a conquering hero sertainly makes sence Ok yes you are correct. It does make sense that the rider is a conquering hero rather than a peaceful entering of deception... Now picture what God did in judgement of Israel. In 70Ad the sacrifices (of animals that were given in rejection of Christ's perfect sacrifice - 30ishAD to 70Ad) were stopped and still are. God had a hand in the destruction of Jerusalem. Christ predicted it. Christ (our conquering hero) rode out bent on conquering the abomination of the Israelites/Jews. It was an important event. That is my view of the rider of the white horse. Thanks for listening/responding. |
|
|
|
Post by Jan on Jul 19, 2003 1:22:02 GMT -5
quideme said You dismiss my view and you do so vehemently as with others who agree with my understanding of Scripture. Please show me where I have not let a person into a converstion and how I would be so powerful to stop someone from posting here? Please tell me where I have been rude? You're right, I don't see prophecy like you do, especially when it comes to Israel. I can discuss eschatology with everyone, but you, guideme, believe you are the only correct one here and everybody else might as well just give it up! You have not said those exact words, but you come accross like that! I don't care what you believe; I do care how you present your thoughts, though - and I am tired of listening to your holier-than-thou posts  <>< |
|
|
|
Post by guidemeLord on Jul 19, 2003 1:54:57 GMT -5
Please show me where I have not let a person into a converstion and how I would be so powerful to stop someone from posting here? Please tell me where I have been rude? You're right, I don't see prophecy like you do, especially when it comes to Israel. I don't care what you believe; I do care how you present your thoughts, though - and I am tired of listening to your holier-than-thou posts <>< Well, Jan. I was offended when you said: You abstainately stated your opinion (holier-than-thou. right?) and then showed distaste for the members of this Board's choice of Moderator. I think that was rude. And right before that I was offended by your offhandedness about the way I view eschatology. Like it was so obviously wrong that you mustn't bother acknowledging my posts... I don't hold a grudge or anything. I just hope you will lighten up when it comes to eschatology so we can discuss this like civilized adults. I think I can make some valid points that should invoke your searching the scriptures. Here you just dismissed it as errant, but "why is it? Can you show me? Can you agree on any points...." That is a good eschatological discussion which addresses all those points... It really isn't that difficult.. I will try my hardest not to contradict what you present without backing it up with scriptures or at least a why.... |
|
|
|
Post by Jan on Jul 19, 2003 2:31:31 GMT -5
Visa versa!  <>< |
|
?
<><